I’m so very proud of my family – from my beautiful and intelligent wife, Angela, to all our kids – each of whom are amazing in their own right. Most families have talented members. Just the other day, one of my cousins, Kelly Hudspeth, wrote an excellent piece on tolerance that I just had to republish here. Hope you enjoy and learn from it.
Kelly wrote: “My son brought home an activity book from school on Cultural Diversity. It’s very interesting and informative. It tells about various arts, foods, music, crafts, and traditions from around the world. The diversity of the peoples of our world is fascinating and I love to explore it. The booklet has some great ideas on learning to appreciate cultural diversity. Things like trying different recipes, going to cultural festivals, and concerts. Our world is rich in traditions, art, music. These arts are a wonderful gift for all to enjoy and appreciate. They have value, regardless of the culture from which they are derived. We must appreciate the beauty and diversity of our world’s cultures to a point. In many ways we have gone too far in ‘tolerating’ diversity. Tolerance of diversity does NOT mean we must allow anyone to do anything they please, does it? It seems as if we are fast approaching that definition of ‘tolerance’.
There are many who would hijack our vocabulary and change the meaning of the words we use. Words like ‘tolerance’, or even ‘marriage’ or ‘culture’ for example. While the arts and music of cultures are ‘equal’ in that they contribute beauty to the world, not all cultures’ traditions are ‘equal’. We do not celebrate various cultural traditions for various reasons. Beheading, human sacrifice, genital-mutilation are traditions from other cultures that are not ‘tolerated’ for instance. Polygamy, child marriage, and cock/dog fighting are cultural traditions that are not ‘tolerated’ within our own. Forced racial and gender oppression and segregation are cultural traditions of which our culture is ‘intolerant’.
I received change from a purchase yesterday and it got me thinking. Money has ‘value’. Yet, it’s not all the ‘same’. It comes in different denominations. Some are ‘worth more’ than others. Some money is counterfeit so it is ‘not worth’ anything. Would a store owner be considered ‘intolerant’ for not allowing someone to pay for a purchase with counterfeit money? As a society, we have arbitrarily assigned value to our currency.
In a sense, traditions also need to be assigned value. As an example, the term ‘marriage’ must be assigned a set definition or it will lose its value. Marriage legally refers to one man and one woman, committing to one another for life. (’no-fault divorce’ has done much to devalue ‘marriage’, long before the GLBT ever began to erode its value by trying to change the definition completely).
The word ‘equality’ is not a synonym for ‘sameness’. And ‘tolerance’ is not a synonym for ‘approval’. It’s my hope that our society can embrace diversity without having to assign equal value to all cultural traditions and beliefs. A homosexual who believes that gay couples should be allowed to marry doesn’t agree with the beliefs of a person who believes in upholding the traditional view of marriage being one man/one woman. A polygamist doesn’t either. So why are we forced to ‘tolerate’ (meaning ‘approve of’) the viewpoint of the homosexual but not the polygamist?
It’s time we take back the language and make words mean certain things again. We must repudiate those who will bend, warp, skew, and even pervert a word for their own personal agenda. A current definition of tolerance is “the acceptance of the differing views of other people, e.g. in religious or political matters, and fairness toward the people who hold these different views”. That is not the basic meaning of tolerance at all. It means to “allow without prohibiting; permit”. Tolerance is different from acceptance. This doesn’t mean we must ACCEPT or AGREE with those views that differ from our own, but we must allow the view to exist. (notice it means to allow the viewpoint, not approve of the behavior).
I find it utterly objectionable that anyone who adheres to conservative values or opinions is described as ‘intolerant’ because we state our disagreement with other viewpoints. Yet, those who adhere to liberal views and consider themselves to be broadminded are the very ones who want to squelch the differing view altogether. It is the one who is trying to squelch the mere expression of the viewpoint who is intolerant. This has got to stop. People must know what their values are, how to express them reasonably and then DEMAND that they be allowed to do so. Just because I say I think you are wrong does not make me intolerant of your viewpoint.
I am fed up with being called a bigot because I hold certain convictions. It is not bigotry to hold a strong opinion that is in disagreement with another’s position. It’s bigotry to disallow the other’s right to hold that differing viewpoint.”